To view graphic version of this page, refresh this page (F5)

Skip to page body

March 16, 1999

March 16, 1999B>

 

 

 

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL RENT
STABILIZATION & ARBITRATION BOARD,
Tuesday, March 16, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. at
25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 70, Lower Level
 

I. Call to Order

    President Wasserman called the meeting to order at 6:09 p.m.
II. Roll Call
    Commissioners Present: Becker; Bierly; Gruber; Justman; Lightner; Marshall; Wasserman.

    Commissioners not Present: Moore; Mosser; Murphy.

    Staff Present: Grubb; Wolf.

III. Approval of the Minutes
    MSC: To approve the Minutes of March 2, 1999.

    (Lightner/Gruber: 5-0)

IV. Old Business
    A. Costa-Hawkins (Civil Code Section 1954.53)

    The Board continued their discussion of issues associated with the implementation of the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995. The Commissioners went through a re-draft of suggested amendments to the Rent Ordinance prepared by Deputy City Attorney Marie Blits as the result of the Board’s discussions at the meetings on January 5th and February 2nd, 1999. The Board re-visited the issues of vacancy control or vacancy decontrol/recontrol when prior tenancies were terminated pursuant to 30-day notice or when health and safety code violations remained unabated for 6 months or longer preceding a vacancy that occurred proximate to the exemption date of January 1, 1999; and discussed which provisions of Costa-Hawkins pertaining to assignment and subletting affect San Francisco’s Ordinance and Rules and Regulations, particularly Rules Section 6.14. As to the question of how to treat rooms in a single family dwelling that are not separately alienable, but are rented out as separate rental units, the consensus of the Board was that once there are 3 separate tenancies, not including the owner, the premises are no longer exempt as a single family dwelling or condominium. In the event that the number of separately rented rooms should fall below 3, any tenants who had resided on the premises when there were 3 separately rented units would continue to be covered. However, if such a unit were vacant, it would be exempt from rent control until such time as 3 rooms were separately rented. It was agreed that only an owner, and not a Master Tenant, could claim exemption pursuant to Costa-Hawkins.

    As to the question of whether the concept of "anniversary dates" will still apply to units that are otherwise exempt from rent increase limitations pursuant to Costa-Hawkins, the Board passed the following motion:

    MSC: To find that the concept of "Anniversary Date" as defined in Rules and Regulations Section 1.11 shall not apply to units exempt from rent increase limitations pursuant to Costa-Hawkins; landlords of such units shall not be limited to "annual" rent increases. (Lightner/Gruber: 3-2; Becker, Marshall dissenting)

    The Deputy Director will forward changes agreed upon by the Board to Ms. Blits for incorporation into a new draft; this issue and discussion of proposed amendments to the Rules and Regulations will be re-calendared for a future meeting.

    B. Rental Unit Fee

    Executive Director Grubb informed the Commissioners that the proposed increase in the Rental Unit Fee necessitated by the 85% increase in workload over the last 3-year period will be $16.00 per unit; $8.00 per residential hotel unit. The fee increase will fund the following positions: 4 Permanent Hearing Officers; 3 Temporary Hearing Officers; 1 Permanent Senior Hearing Officer; 3 Permanent Citizens’ Complaint Officers; and 1 City Attorney Investigator to assist with investigation and monitoring of complaints of wrongful eviction. The fee will be deducted from the interest due on the tenant’s security deposit; landlords who are current in the payment of such interest will be allowed to continue to bill separately for collection of the fee. Landlords will be able to "bank" the fee, just as they are allowed to "bank" the annual allowable rent increase.

V. Communications
    The Board received a copy of an article from The Independent of March 16, 1999 regarding a lawsuit being filed by property owners challenging the constitutionality of Proposition G and recently enacted legislation requiring a Conditional Use Permit for conversion to non-rental use, including owner-occupancy, in buildings containing 3 or more units.
VI. Calendar Items
    March 23, 1999 - NO MEETING

    March 30, 1999

    9 appeal considerations

    Old Business:

    A. Interest Rate When Capital Improvement Work is Financed with a Variable Rate Mortgage

    B. Issues Possibly Warranting Amendments to the Ordinance and Rules and Regulations

    New Business: Proposed Amendment to Rules Section 1.17 Regarding Non-Residential Use of a Unit

VII. Adjournment
    President Wasserman adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m.

Last updated: 10/9/2009 11:26:13 AM